| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
HOME PAGE ESC
200 - Spring 2002 Prof: Linda Brubaker |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LECTURE OVERVIEW Basic statement: The open growth system of trees permits a variety of branching patterns, leaf placements and overall crown shapes. The geometric forms of some trees is so distinctive that they can be identified by their silhouettes alone. Different tree forms have been addressed by several models that seek to explain the adaptive value of branching patterns. Key ideas: Henry Horn developed a model to explain the differences in branching pattern and leaf placement of angiosperm trees. Light and heat are the primary selective agents in this model. The model suggests that leaf-size and leaf-placement patterns are strategies to maximize photosynthesis and minimize heat stress at different stages of forest succession. Other models by Leopold and by Stevens provide conceptual frameworks to explain stem form and branching pattern. All models stress the adaptive nature of tree architecture. Important terms:
LECTURE OUTLINE (powerpoint version) Introduction Concepts of adaptive
geometry are used to understand advantages of different geometric
forms of trees, leaves and branching patterns. Terms: multilayer monolayer Assumptions to theory of adaptive geometry:
Consequences of leaf placement in sunny environments: multilayer: If
leaves are not in shadow, >1 surface area of leaves can carry out
max. rates of photosynthesis, and lower leaves have lower heat stress Consequences of leaf placement in shady environments: multilayer: <
1 layer can carry out max. photosynthesis, because lower leaves are
at <20% full sunlight PREDICTIONS FROM CONCEPTS OF ADAPTIVE GEOMETRY
What is the logic behind these predictions? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contact Linda Brubaker at: lbru@u.washington.edu
[ University of Washington ]                         [ College of Forest Resources ] |