|
Abstract
from: McDade, K. A. 2002. Habitat relationships of
small
terrestrial vertebrates and invertebrates in managed
forests in the Southern Oregon Cascades. M. S. Thesis.
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 212 pp.
Silviculture
systems that involve commercial thinning may provide
higher quality wildlife habitat than traditional clearcut
systems, yet such systems have not been vigorously tested.
This prospective study examined forest floor animal
abundance and habitat relationships under three different
silviculture conditions: clearcuts, commercial thins,
and uncuts. Eighteen stands, six per treatment, were
selected in the Umpqua National Forest, in the Southern
Oregon Cascades, and surveyed for ground-dwelling fauna.
A total of 3,359 arthropods, 202 gastropods, 212 amphibians,
and 456 small mammals were captured in pitfall traps;
130 gastropods and 19 salamanders were located during
transect searches. Pitfall traps were open for 28 consecutive
days in fall 1999; because of large numbers captured
arthropods were counted only on the first nine sample
days. Western red-backed vole (Clethrionomys californicus)
and overall amphibian captures, and gastropod species
richness and diversity decreased with harvest intensity.
Small mammal and amphibian species richness and northwestern
salamander (Ambystoma gracile) captures were
significantly higher in uncut stands than either thins
or clearcuts. Ensatina (Ensatina eschscholtzii)
and Haplotrema snail captures were significantly
higher in thin stands than clearcut stands, though,
captures did not differ between clearcuts and uncuts.
Small mammal, Trowbridge shrew (Sorex trowbridgii),
gastropod, and cricket (Gryllidae/Gryllacrididae) captures
were similar between thin and uncut stands but there
were significantly fewer captures in clearcuts than
uncuts. Vagrant shrew (S. vagrans), grasshopper
(Acrididae), beetle (Coleoptera), and millipede (Diplopoda)
captures were highest in clearcut stands. No treatment
differences were observed for deer mice (Peromyscus
maniculatus), Oregon voles (Microtus oregoni),
Vespericola snails, reticulated tail dropper
slugs (Prophysaon andersoni), overall arthropods,
or spiders (Araneae).
Multiple
linear regression results showed that canopy cover and
basal area were important habitat variables for Trobridge
shrews, Haplotrema snails, and crickets, which
suggests that these animals may be sensitive to tree
removal. Other important habitat variables were down
wood volume (Haplotrema and cricket), shrub
cover (Haplotrema), duff and litter depth (ensatina
and Vespericola) and gravely soils (Haplotrema).
Trowbridge shrew, Ensatina, and Haplotrema detections
were positively correlated with relative humidity and
rainfall. Grasshoppers were the only animal analyzed
for habitat relationships that were correlated to open
forest habitat.
In
sum, 4 of the 15 ground-dwelling fauna species analyzed
for treatment differences were found more frequently
in uncuts than clearcuts. Four species had higher capture
rates in thins than clearcuts and only 1 species (northwestern
salamander) was captured more frequently in uncuts than
thins. These results suggest that commercial thinning
does not affect forest floor animal populations as severely
as clearcut harvesting and may be a useful silvicultural
tool that will provide both wildlife habitat and a sustainable
timber supply.
|