Effects
of green-tree retention on the availability of arthropod
prey to bark-gleaning birds: assessment from a large-scale
field experiment
Juraj Halaj1, Maria Mayrhofer2,
and David A. Manuwal2
1Cascadien, Inc.
Corvallis, Oregon 97330 USA
jhalaj@cascadien.com
2College of Forest Resources
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98195 USA
Green-tree retention is gaining popularity
as a forest management tool in the Pacific Northwest. The
Demonstration of Ecosystem Management Options (DEMO) study
is the first experimental attempt to assess the ecological
consequences of this silvicultural model to a wide range
of forest organisms. We report on an ongoing study investigating
the effects of varying levels (100%, 40% and 15%) and patterns
(aggregated vs. dispersed) of green-tree retention on the
availability of arthropod prey to bark-gleaning birds.
The experiment has a randomized block design and utilizes
five 13-ha treatment units at each of three DEMO study
sites in the western Cascade Range of Oregon and Washington.
Arthropods were collected using crawl traps installed on
live Douglas-fir trees and snags and with D-vac sampling
of tree boles during bird breeding season from May through
August 2003. Early results from June and July 2003 show
that the bark arthropod community was dominated by Collembola
(38.7%), Arachnida (14.2%), Hemiptera (13.7%) and Coleoptera
(11.0%). Arthropod abundance was 1.2-2.3 times higher on
live trees than snags but biomass was similar on both categories
of trees. Spiders appeared especially sensitive to different
combinations of green-tree retention. Significant shifts
in the spider guild structure were found among treatments
and their abundance on live trees was about 14-32% higher
in dispersed than aggregated treatments, and 13-20% higher
at 15% than 40% tree retention levels. These findings,
which could be explained in part by variation in the forest
overstory structure and microclimatic conditions, suggest
that the quantity and spatial arrangement of remnant trees
after harvest may have considerable impact on the availability
and quality of food to bark-gleaning birds.
Introduction
Green-tree retention is
gaining popularity as a forest management tool in the Pacific
Northwest. This practice is mandated on federally managed
lands by the Standards and Guidelines of the Northwest
Forest Plan. An explicit assumption of this silvicultural
model is the preservation of characteristics of late-successional
forests to conserve biodiversity. Effective implementation
of this goal, however, requires a thorough understanding
of how changes in forest structure affect ecological processes
and community development. The Demonstration of Ecosystem
Management Options (DEMO) study is the first attempt to
provide the needed empirical evidence to evaluate consequences
of green-tree retention in the Douglas-fir region of the
western United States and provides a unique platform to
study species and habitat interactions at scales relevant
to forest management.
 |
 |
| Figure
1. (A) Remnants of live trees
and snags in a harvest-matrix unit (photo C. B. Halpern,
University of Washington). (B). Brown creeper, Certhia
americana (photo J. Parrish, Utah Division of Natural
Resources). |
Materials and Methods
The study is a randomized-block
experiment utilizing three DEMO blocks (DP,
LWS, WF) and
five treatments. Treatment units represent 13-ha forest
stands (e.g., Fig 1A) with varying levels of retention
(100%, 40% and 15%) of the original stand basal area and
arrangement of remnant trees (1-ha aggregates vs. dispersed
trees).
 |
 |
| Figure
2. (A) A bark trap [a modified design after Hanula & New
(1996)] and (B) D-vac arthropod collector. |
Within
each stand, arthropods were collected with crawl traps
(Fig. 2A) installed on live Douglas-fir
trees (n = 10-20) and snags
(n = 10-20) with a dbh of ≥ 50 cm, randomly
selected in permanent vegetation plots. Arthropods
were sampled at 2 to 4-week intervals during brown-creeper
breeding
season from May through August 2003 with a total of
540 traps. Less mobile species and stages of arthropods
were
sampled with a D-vac sampler (Fig. 3B)
from the same number of trees in June and July 2003.
Collected arthropods were
identified to order or family level and their biomass
was estimated using length-weight regression models.
Data were
analyzed with ANOVAs using stand-level averages of
response variables. A more detailed analysis of treatment
effects
on spiders was performed since these predators appear
to be an important food resource of brown creepers.
A fecal
analysis is also being conducted to further clarify
dietary preferences of brown creepers in our study
system.
Results and Discussion
|
| Figure
4. Guild structure of corticolous
arthropods expressed as (A) number of individuals and
(B) dry biomass. Based on a total of 37,182 individuals
collected in bark traps June-July 2003. Collembola
were excluded from subsequent analysis since they are
unlikely to represent a significant food source for
brown creepers. |
Preliminary analysis of bark-trap data shows that the
arthropod community was dominated by Collembola (38.7%;
88.3% Entomobryidae), Arachnida (14.2%), Hemiptera (13.7%)
and Coleoptera (11.0%) (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the majority
of arthropod biomass on tree bark was contributed by Coleoptera
(31.9%; 66.3% Curculionidae), Diplopoda (29.3%), Orthoptera
(17.8%) and arachnids (15.1%) (Fig. 4B). Spiders comprised
as much as 96.9% and 99.8% of arachnid abundance and biomass,
respectively.
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Figure
5. Effects of retention treatments
and tree status (live trees vs. snags) on the abundance
of (A,C) total arthropods (excluding Collembola and
Arachnida) and (B,D) arachnids collected in bark traps
June-July 2003. |
Analysis of data from bark-traps showed significant differences
among retention treatments, indicating a trend of numerical
increase in the abundance of arthropods with the level
of tree removal (Fig. 5). With the exception of live trees
in 40%A, arthropod numbers increased in all treatments
from 12% to as much 158%, compared to control. The highest
densities of arthropods were collected in 15%D units (Fig.
5A,C). Spiders appeared especially sensitive among arthropods
to different combinations of green-tree retention. Significant
shifts in the spider guild structure were found among treatments
and their abundance on live trees was about 14-32% higher
in dispersed than aggregated treatments, and 13-20% higher
at 15% than 40% tree retention levels (Fig. 5B,D). Live
trees supported significantly higher densities of non-arachnid
arthropods than snags (1.2-2.3x); similar, but less pronounced
patterns were observed for arachnids (Fig. 5A,B).
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Figure
6. Effects of retention treatments
and tree status on the biomass of (A,C) total arthropods
(excluding Collembola and Arachnida) and (B,D) arachnids
collected in bark traps June-July 2003. |
Similar
to abundance data, more arthropod biomass was found
on trees in the lowest-retention units but this trend
was not statistically significant (Fig. 6A,C).
In contrast, control stands and 40% retention units had
the highest
levels of arachnid biomass, which was caused in part
by a decline in the abundance of the Amaurobiidae, spider
species with the largest body size in our study (≤ 18.8mm),
in the highly fragmented 15% treatments. A greater abundance
of prey on live trees implies that snags may represent
less suitable foraging substrates to brown creepers.
Observations
of creepers’ foraging behavior in western Oregon
also show that the species prefers large live Douglas-fir
trees. Interestingly, however, both categories of trees
in our study supported similar amounts of arthropod biomass
(Fig. 6), suggesting that creepers may
show preferences for prey categories found on live trees
or that other
non-trophic factors influence the selection of their
foraging substrate.
Results from the ongoing fecal analysis should help us
clarify food preferences of brown creepers and focus
our analysis on ecologically relevant prey groups.
 |
 |
| Figure
7. Examples of the spatial pattern
of arthropod distribution on live trees in treatment
units (A) 15%D and (B) 40%A of WF block. Study design
utilized a 7x9 sampling grid of permanent vegetation
plots with a 40-m spacing between plot centers. Each
bubble represents values from 1-2 bark traps and its
size is proportional to the average amount of arthropod
catch (mg) per trap per day, collected June-July 2003. |
Spatial patterns of arthropod distribution showed substantial
levels of heterogeneity within experimental stands (Fig.
7). This could be related to variation in microclimatic
conditions or quality of understory vegetation. In an ongoing
analysis, we are using existing vegetation datasets from
permanent vegetation plots to test the significance of
understory vegetation as predictors of arthropod abundance.
In addition, the spatial characteristic of our data also
allows the use of a GIS analysis to generate a resource
utilization distribution for each treatment unit to asses
the relative importance of specific habitat resources to
brown creepers. This work is in progress.