ESRM 401, Spring 2010
Spring Comes to the Cascades
Instructors: Tom Hinckley & Julie Combs

Home & Critical Page

Assignments

Class Goals

Field Trips

Schedule

Student Issues

Teaching Team

Background material on:

References

Archival Material

Field Trips Historical

Gradients (03-19-08)

What do we mean by gradients? As one drives from Port Angeles to Hurricane Ridge, from Eatonville to Paradise, from Enumclaw to Sunrise, from North Bend to Snoqualmie Pass (or Cle Elum to Snoqualmie Pass or Cle Elum to the parking area for the North Fork of the Teanaway River) and from Gold Bar to Stevens Pass, vegetation changes. It changes in both composition and size. Douglas-fir grows at low elevation and Pacific silver fir at higher elevations. Douglas-fir at low elevation is different from that at high elevation. For example, Douglas-fir tends to be taller at lower as compared to higher elevations. These changes are the result of environmental gradients. For example, from Seattle to North Bend and from North Bend to Snoqualmie Pass, precipitation almost doubles with each step. Temperature changes, the form of precipitation changes. Below is a discussion of gradients and plants.

Justification: If one examines almost any surface of the earth, one is presented with an array of different environmental gradients (see definitions below). For example, as one goes from the Pacific Ocean and coast over the Olympics to the Sound and then over the Cascades and to the Columbia, there are four major gradients over a relatively short distance. A change in elevation with a change in distance is, by definition, a gradient. However, associated with changes in elevation are small to large changes in other environmental variables and it is these changes that in turn affect the types of plant and animal species present. Even apparently abrupt changes, for example, at the coast line of the Pacific Ocean or the Puget Sound, there are gradients (for example, humidity). Indeed, at the scale that biological organisms respond, these apparently abrupt changes are really gradual.

In the College's new set of core courses, we present concepts and then use these concepts to help us understand the patterns we see. In wildland environments, perhaps we feel more comfortable with gradients whereas in urban and production land environments, we may beless comfortable with the idea of gradients (abruptness seems pervasive in both managed and urban landscapes). We also see that scale, another important concept, influences both our and the organism of interest's "perceptions" of environmental change (whether gradual or abrupt). Finally, much of our management activities tend to be applied in discrete (i.e., abrupt) rather than gradual ways (e.g., hazard trees are removed, stands are harvested, jurisdictional boundaries are ubiquitous, etc.).

Gradient Definition: From the 3rd Edition (2000) of the American Heritage College Dictionary: 1. A rate of inclination; a slope. 2. An ascending or descending part; an incline. 3. Phys. The rate at which a physical quantity, such as pressure, changes with respect to a given variable, especially distance. 4. Math. A vector having coordinate components that are the partial derivatives of a function with respect to its variables. 5. Biol. A series of progressively changing differences in the growth rate, metabolism, or physiological activity of a cell, an organ, or an organism.

From an elementary Webster's Dictionary: Gradient = a continuous graded change in a measured activity or substance (e.g., vertical temperature gradient in a lake).

Background: Although considerable ecological research uses gradient analysis (e.g., Curtis 1959, Von Numers and van der Maarel 1998, Wheeler and Proctor 2000), most scientists recognize that distinct communities develop along these gradients. In some cases, the boundaries between these communities are extraordinarily clear whereas in other cases, one community type grades into another and there is not a distinct boundary (see Figures 1 and 2). The gradients may be straight-forward such as latitude, elevation, temperature, light, soil depth, soil nutrition, soil moisture, pH, water level, precipitation, or more complicated such as the acid base-poor vs. neutral, base- and bicarbonate-rich gradient, soil redox potential, oxygen concentration, etc.

Here we see likely gradients of moisture due to direct (e.g., rainfall or snowmelt drainage, accumulation, etc.) and indirect effects (e.g., soil formation and soil accumulation) of elevation to create distinctive lines between several different community types. In this picture from a subalpine meadow, one again sees distinctive types (red huckleberry, for example, then the heather, then shrub, then trees). Here gradients of snow depth, soil temperature and soil moisture may be found.

So then how does one go from a gradient to where there appears to be such distinctive communities (defined as an association of interacting plant and animal populations, usually defined by the nature of their interactions, the place which they live or some combination of the dominant overstory and understory plants [for example, a Douglas-fir, western hemlock forest with an understory of sword fern and Oregon grape])? One can understand that each organism has a particular environment in which it can survive and grow. It would then seem that along a gradient one should see gradual increases and decreases in different species. To a certain extent, one can see examples of gradual changes; however, more often one sees rather abrupt or dramatic changes. How does this occur?

In order to understand how relatively distinct communities form, one must first understand how the individual species responds and then how the response is modified in the presence of other species due to competition. The first step is both straight-forward and relatively easily understood. The second is not.

Step 1 (response of the individual species): One can describe for a population of a given plant species, the ability of the individuals making up that population to grow (height at age 50 or height increment, or biomass per individual per year are just a few examples of how growth might be determined). If one graphs the average height at age 10 of the individuals growing on various sites along a soil moisture gradient the heights might look like this:

There is height (in meters) on the y-axis and some index of soil moisture on the x-axis. This gradient begins on the left with very dry or xeric conditions (e.g., low precipitation, high evaporative demand or thin soils or soils with very coarse, gravelly texture) to mesic (moist, but well aerated) to increasingly moist and then wet with even standing water (hydric or wet end). Three species are shown (lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir and Sitka spruce [or grand fir]). Each species has a particular distribution and ability to grow along this gradient (for example, lodgepole pine does better on either end, grand fir or Sitka spruce on the moist to hydric end). Each species has a differently shaped curve and as a result of the gradient, the species response to the gradient will be affected by the other species present and their competitive or non-competitive interactions with the species in question. A community then is the result of the response of the available species to the various gradients (remember moisture is not the only one) and to interactions amongst and between the species.
Species response curves: The theoretical abundance of five different species along an environmental gradient is shown above. Three species have somewhat of a similar pattern of abundance (these three species appear to fit a Gaussian model of species distributions) whereas the lower two are distinctly different. In the example above, three different plant associations (~community types) arise.
Two riparian transects (from LC Lee 1982 Ph.D. Dissertation, UW): one from the Flathead River in Montana (bottom) and the other from the Suiattle River on the west side of the Cascades, Washington. Notice how small changes in elevation or substrate type or slope position have dramatic effects on species composition and growth of those species.

Management Implications: In spite of the myriad of gradients that exist, most plant and animal communities appear to be organized into distinctive communities. Typically management occurs at one of several levels of biological organization: an individual organism (e.g., a hazard or diseased tree), a population (e.g., a list population of a particular salmon species, an elk herd), a stand, an ecosystem, a watershed or a landscape level. Because of either disturbances (e.g., fire, clearcut) or jurisdictional boundaries, many plants are managed on a stand level basis. As we increasingly appreciate the interactions between various organisms and we better understand the services provided by assemblages of organisms, management becomes more sophisticated and approaches a situation where several different levels of biological organization are considered. This would be even true for hazard tree evaluation as such a tree could provide a range of services beyond itself if left standing.

The figure above illustrates how the different parts of a forest stand are utilized by specific bird species.

In a sense, birds utilize the environmental gradients that exist in a forest stand (gradients of moisture, wind, heat, light, etc., see Figure above). Stand structure creates these gradients.

Glossary of Terms

  • Abundance: some measure of the amount of a species. Can be % cover, density, biomass, frequency (% of sites occupied).
  • Community: An association of interacting populations, usually defined by the nature of their interaction or the place in which they live. Hard to demonstrate the nature and extent of interaction (even if there is an interaction).
  • Diversity: the variety, or number of kinds of species.
  • Environmental gradient: Some spatially-varying aspect of the environment which is expected to be important for species distributions.
    • Simple environmental gradients:
      • plants
        • soil nitrogen
        • soil temperature
        • soil moisture
        • soil depth
        • annual precipitation
      • animals
        • prey availability
        • soil texture (for burrowing animals)
        • height above low tide (for intertidal organisms).
    • Complex-gradient: a spatially-varying aspect of the environment which influences many other environmental gradients
      • elevation
      • soil pH
      • slope
  • Gaussian model of species distributions: The distribution of a given species along environmental gradients can be described as a Gaussian curve with a given modal location or ecological optimum (A), height or ecological amplitude (B), and width or niche breadth (C). A species with a narrow niche breadth is a specialist, a species with a large niche breadth is a generalist. A species with a large ecological amplitude is a dominant, at least for some position along the environmental gradient.
  • Gradient analysis - the portrayal and interpretation of the abundances of species along environmental gradients of physical conditions.
  • Keystone species: a species which influences the entire community so much that its removal will cause ecosystem collapse (can be a keystone predator).
  • Relative abundance: The proportion of the abundance allotted to each species. Must sum to 1 or 100%.
  • Species composition: A list of the species present in a community, along with a measure of their relative abundance.
  • Species response curve : a plot of the abundance of a species as a function of position along an environmental gradient or complex-gradient.
  • Succession: change in species composition through time.

References:

  • Von Numers, M. and E. van der Maarel. 1998. Plant distribution patterns and ecological gradients in the Southwest Finnish archipelago. Global Ecology & Biogeography 7: 421-440.

  • Wheeler, B. D. & Proctor, M. C. F. (2000) Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. Journal of Ecology 88: 187-203.

Back to top

[College of Forest Resources]

[University of Washington]

 

 

CFR Template Version 0.2.0 APR-018-2003